Forget More to Learn More

We've been taught to fear forgetting.

We often see it as a personal flaw, a defect, a crack in our intelligence, a weakness in our character, a sign that we're not good at languages.

Forgetting costs us grades in school, credibility in jobs, and embarrassment in daily life.

We fear forgetting in language learning. So we highlight words. Cram them. Memorize them like machines. And when they slip away, we panic. Some even ask, "If I can't remember anything, what's the point of learning?"

But what if forgetting wasn't a setback but a signal that your brain is preparing for deep learning?

As a scientist, I can tell you this with confidence:

Forgetting is not a failure. It's learning in disguise.

We don't learn by memorizing alone.

We learn by forgetting and then remembering again.

One of my students had been preparing for a language exam. Her notes were impeccable. Her verb tables were memorized. But during the exam, everything collapsed. She studied hard, and yet she failed. She had followed the system many of us have been taught:

Cram. Review the night before. Recall under pressure. Succeed.

She failed because she studied as if language were a list of facts to retrieve, and not a system to rebuild.

Language isn't something you memorize once, like historical dates or biology terms. You reconstruct it every time you use it.

This article will show you:

• Why forgetting happens
• What it means when information disappears
• Why your brain is built to forget
• And most importantly, how to use that process to build lasting language fluency faster and remember better.

The Illusion of Knowing

One of the most misleading sensations is the feeling of having learned something just because it seems familiar.

You go through a vocabulary list. You nod at the words. They look familiar. You highlight the ones you think you "kind of know." You might even recall them correctly on a multiple-choice quiz. It feels like progress.

But this kind of confidence is deceptive.

It creates the illusion of knowing —a deceptive feeling of mastery based on recognition, not recall (Roediger & Karpicke, 2006; Kornell & Bjork, 2009).

You recognize the information, but haven't truly learned it in a way that allows you to retrieve and use it under pressure.

This illusion is reinforced by most of our learning environments.

In school, we're rewarded for short-term recognition. In language apps, we get dopamine hits from tapping the right answer. In digital flashcards, we swipe quickly through what looks familiar and feel satisfied.

But knowledge isn't built on recognition.

It is built on retrieval — the effortful act of pulling something from memory and using it.

Effort is what cements knowledge.

In other words,

The harder it feels to recall something, the more your memory benefits.

This is why re-reading fails, but struggling to remember works (Karpicke & Roediger, 2008).

As Carey (2014) explains in How We Learn, memory isn't a static container but a living system that "reshapes itself based on what we struggle to retrieve."

That's the paradox.

Struggle isn't a flaw in your learning. It's the engine.

The Science of Forgetting: What a Century of Research Reveals

We often think of forgetting as something passive, like information fading into the background over time. But cognitive science tells us that forgetting is active, dynamic, and strategic.

And it's essential to learning.

Thorndike's Law of Disuse — and Why It Was Wrong

In 1914, Edward Thorndike proposed the law of disuse, which claimed that memories weaken simply because they aren't used. The logic was simple: use it or lose it (Thorndike, 1914).

However, in 1932, psychologist John McGeoch showed that forgetting isn't caused by the passage of time, but by interference, when new information competes with older knowledge, making retrieval more difficult (McGeoch, 1932).

The brain doesn't delete old knowledge.

You can't access it because other memories get in the way, and you struggle to access it in a sea of competing cues.

It's like walking into a closet to grab your favorite jacket, only to find it buried behind ten others you've recently worn. The memory is still there. But unless you pull it out regularly, it gets harder to find.

This means forgetting isn't decay. It's cue failure. The information is there, but unreachable at the moment.

In language learning, this interference is constant. You learn silla in Spanish, then Stuhl in German. You master one grammar tense, then move to another. Each new layer of information can bury the old one unless you keep retrieving it.

Forgetting doesn't mean the memory is lost. It means your access path is blocked. And retrieval is how you get it back.

That insight opened the door for later theories of retrieval-based learning.

Learning Is Not a Single Event

In the 1950s, William Estes developed a statistical theory of learning that emphasized variability, not stability.

He showed that learning is probabilistic, meaning it is unstable across days and contexts and deeply sensitive to when and how information is retrieved (Estes, 1950). What works one day might fail the next.

The key points are that learning is:

• happening over time, not in a single moment when you study.
• a cumulative, distributed process that happens across a series of encounters, retrievals, and refinements.

You might produce a sentence correctly today, then stumble over the same structure tomorrow. That doesn't mean you're regressing. It means the memory is still stabilizing.

Bjork & Bjork's Theory of Disuse: Storage vs. Retrieval Strength

Robert and Elizabeth Bjork (1992) argued that every memory has two types of strength:

1. Storage strength: how well the memory is encoded and understood
2. Retrieval strength: how easily it can be accessed at a specific time

Storage strength builds slowly and fades slowly. Once a memory is well-formed, it tends to stick.

Retrieval strength, on the other hand, fades fast, especially if the memory isn't used.

Imagine your brain as a big storage room with hundreds of labeled boxes.

Storage strength is how securely you've packed the word inside the right box. It's in there — safe, organized, intact. But retrieval strength is your ability to find that exact box when you need it — quickly, without knocking over a dozen others first.

You can spend hours packing words into boxes (studying), but if you never practice walking into the room and pulling them out (retrieving), they stay buried under layers of dust. Each retrieval strengthens the path. Each struggle makes it smoother.

So you might know the Spanish word silla ("chair"). You've studied it, written it, maybe even used it once. But if you haven't retrieved it in a real context recently (spoken it aloud, used it in a sentence), it slips just out of reach. You've stored the knowledge, but you haven't trained your brain to access it efficiently.

And here's the paradox:

The only way to strengthen retrieval is to practice retrieving.

Not reviewing. Not rereading.

But effortfully pulling the word from memory, again and again, across time, in different contexts. Even when you fail to recall something, the very attempt makes the memory more durable the next time around.

As Bjork and Bjork (1992) wrote, retrieval is a learning event. It strengthens memory more than passive review ever could.

This theory gave rise to their concept of desirable difficulties: the idea that the harder it feels to recall something, the more you benefit from trying.

Struggling to recall something, even failing to do so, is what strengthens the memory long-term.

Ebbinghaus Was Right — But Not How You Think

In the late 1800s, Hermann Ebbinghaus famously charted the "forgetting curve," showing how much information we lose after learning if we don't revisit it.

If you know how fast forgetting happens, you can plan your revision to interrupt it.

Spacing out retrieval, what researchers now call spaced repetition, helps you catch memories just before they disappear, which is when reactivation has the biggest effect (Carey, 2014; Karpicke & Roediger, 2008).

A rough guideline for timing retrieval:

• First review: within 24 hours
• Second: 2–3 days later
• Third: 1 week later
• Fourth: 2–3 weeks later
• Then: monthly or as needed

Retrieving at the edge of forgetting strengthens long-term retention far more than reviewing too soon.

Memory Regression and the Expert Advantage

There's another layer to this.

If we don't use newer knowledge, we tend to regress, i.e., fall back on what's more familiar (Bjork & Bjork, 1992). A newly acquired grammar structure might disappear, and we revert to old habits.

But interestingly, this regression affects novices more than experts. Experienced learners can tolerate it. They recover faster.

Why?

Because their underlying memory structures are better reinforced.

Why Forgetting Is a Crucial Part of Learning

As Carey (2014) writes in How We Learn,

"Forgetting is the scaffold upon which memory is built."

The act of forgetting creates the need to remember.

Each time you forget and then recall, your memory becomes more resilient.

Even brief delays in recall can lead to stronger memory consolidation (Kriechbaum & Bäuml, 2023). Their research demonstrated that retrieval spacing, not just review frequency, improves long-term retention.

Forgetting is like walking a forest trail that starts to fade. The first time you blaze the path, it's rough and hard to follow. But every time you walk it again, especially after a pause, you trample the weeds, clear the way, and make the route easier to travel next time. Each retrieval strengthens the path.

You don't learn when you review, but when you forget, struggle, recall, and reconnect.

So the actual path of learning is:

Forget → retrieve → strengthen → apply → forget again → retrieve again.

In the context of vocabulary learning, you don't learn when you hear a word. You learn when you forget it, reach for it, rebuild the path to it, and use it again.

This explains why flashcards, when used passively, often fail, while retrieval-based strategies succeed (Kornell et al., 2009):

• Generative practice forces you to produce from memory, like writing a sentence without prompts.
• Elaborative rehearsal connects new words to what you already know by explaining them in your terms or linking them to personal experiences.
• Context-based production uses language in real situations, like conversation, journaling, or storytelling, where retrieval happens naturally.

Each strategy makes your brain search, assemble, and use what you've learned. That's what makes the learning stick.

You can find a full breakdown of how I apply these and other principles in my system here: How to Learn 5,000 Words (and More) Without Flashcards

Why Your Brain Was Built to Forget

It might feel like your brain is working against you when you forget a word or a grammar rule.

But actually, your brain was designed to forget.

The Brain Can't and Shouldn't Remember Everything

Your brain is a filter.

Every second, it decides what to keep and what to let go. It does this not to sabotage your learning, but to protect your attention and help you adapt.

Think of it like an email inbox with aggressive spam filters. Only the most relevant messages make it through. The rest are archived or deleted.

As Carey (2014) writes in How We Learn, the brain's job isn't to remember everything. It's to respond to what matters most right now.

So memory is selective by design, and forgetting isn't a malfunction, but part of the system.

That's why:

• You remember your childhood phone number, but not the phrase you highlighted yesterday.
• You can quote lines from a ྖs cartoon, but forget a basic noun you studied last week.
• You might vividly recall that Mario Götze scored the winning goal for Germany in the 113th minute of the 2014 World Cup Final against Argentina, but not what you had for dinner last night.

The brain doesn't reward effort alone.

It prioritizes emotion, relevance, novelty, and frequency.

Motivation Shapes Memory

We remember what we care about.

Research confirms that emotionally charged or goal-connected information sticks far better than neutral facts (Tyng et al., 2017).

That embarrassing moment you used the wrong word in front of native speakers? You'll remember that word forever.

But the tenth flashcard you reviewed at midnight? Probably gone by morning.

That's why learners who rely only on dry drills or isolated apps often plateau. If the brain doesn't sense personal relevance, it sees no reason to keep the info.

Your Brain Is an Efficiency Expert

John Anderson's ACT-R theory (1983, 1990) showed that the brain works like an intelligent algorithm, constantly optimizing.

Your brain is like a smartphone running low on storage. To keep functioning smoothly, it automatically offloads unused apps, clears your photo cache, and prioritizes space for what you use most often. It's not erasing randomly. It's optimizing.

Likewise, your brain quietly prunes away details you haven't needed lately, reinforcing the mental "apps" you repeatedly open.

This is why cramming doesn't work. The brain sees raw effort without context as noise and filters it out.

• It learns patterns.
• It deletes exceptions.
• It even suppresses rarely-used rules, not because they're unimportant, but because they clutter up processing speed.

Forgetting Helps Us Generalize

Surprisingly, forgetting details is also how we form general rules.

When you can no longer recall every individual example, your brain starts detecting the structure underneath.

It's stripping away specifics to build general rules. This is what Carey (2014) refers to as "background learning" — the kind that works beneath the surface.

You don't become fluent by memorizing 1,000 phrases. You become fluent when your brain starts to recognize the patterns behind those phrases and apply them flexibly to new situations.

In the next section, we'll get practical. You'll learn how to work with forgetting, instead of fighting it, through timing, spacing, and smarter study design.

Making Forgetting Work for You

If forgetting is part of how we learn, the goal isn't to eliminate it, but to use it.

This means structuring your learning to catch memories just as they begin to fade, forcing your brain to retrieve them, and thereby reinforcing them more deeply.

Here's how to make that process work in your favor.

1. Time Your Reviews with the Forgetting Curve

Hermann Ebbinghaus's forgetting curve showed that we begin to lose information almost immediately after learning it. But if you interrupt forgetting at the right time, the memory becomes stronger.

A simple schedule looks like this:

• First review: same day or within 24 hours
• Second: 2–3 days later
• Third: 1 week later
• Fourth: 2–3 weeks later
• Then: monthly or context-driven

This approach, known as spaced retrieval, is far more effective than studying everything in one block (Cepeda et al., 2006; Karpicke & Roediger, 2008).

Apps like Anki use this principle. But even without flashcards, you can create it with journal prompts, voice memos, or revisiting materials at intentional intervals.

2. Make Retrieval Harder, Not Easier

Psychologist Robert Bjork introduced the concept of desirable difficulties — challenges that feel frustrating in the moment but enhance learning long-term (Bjork, 1994).

This includes:

• Trying to recall before checking your notes
• Translating in reverse (e.g., Second Language (L2) → First Language (L1) and back)
• Practicing in noisy or unpredictable environments
• Producing full sentences, not just isolated words

The key is this:

If it feels easy, it's probably not making you smarter.

Memory strengthens through effort. Struggle is a sign that your brain is adapting.

3. Use Retrieval in Multiple Contexts

The brain encodes memories better when they're used in varied ways. This is called contextual variability, and it's especially important for language.

Instead of reviewing a list of words in isolation:

• Use them in a story
• Say them aloud in a conversation
• Write a personal reflection
• Hear them in a podcast, then repeat aloud
• Try to explain them to someone else

Each variation forces your brain to reconstruct the meaning from different angles, reinforcing the network of connections that make retrieval faster and more flexible (Carey, 2014).

4. Plan to Forget, Then Retrieve

One of the most overlooked techniques is planning for forgetting in your learning design.

Ask yourself:

• When will I likely forget this?
• Where will I re-encounter it?
• How can I make sure it comes back again and again?

In the classroom, this might mean spiraling back to old topics in new formats.

In self-study, it might mean revisiting themes across weeks, not just once.

5. Focus on Retrieval Over Exposure

The temptation is to keep consuming more: more lessons, more content, more lists.

But true progress often means revisiting the same material and seeing what your brain can recall, not just what it can recognize.

That's why systems based on retrieval, like the one I describe in How to Learn 5,000 Words Without Flashcards, tend to be more effective than high-volume exposure methods.

6. Accept Interference as a Sign of Growth

If you speak multiple languages, interference is unavoidable. You'll reach for one word and get another. You'll mix tenses or articles.

That's not regression, but cognitive restructuring.

The mind is organizing a more complex system, and the occasional mix-up is part of that.

For more on how this process works in multilinguals, and why it's not a flaw but an upgrade, see Inside the Multilingual Mind.

7. Interleave, Don't Block

Instead of studying one topic or structure in a big block, like 30 minutes of only the past tense, mix topics.

This technique, called interleaving, helps the brain learn to discriminate between similar concepts and strengthens long-term retention (Rohrer & Taylor, 2007). In language learning, it might look like:

• Alternating tenses every few examples
• Mixing vocabulary themes (e.g., emotions, travel, colors)
• Practicing different skills in one session (listening + speaking + writing)

Even if it feels more chaotic, research shows it improves learning more than blocked practice.

8. Use Generation Before Instruction

Before looking up a rule or translation, try to guess it.

This is known as the generation effect: attempting to generate a solution, even incorrectly, strengthens later recall (Slamecka & Graf, 1978).

• Try to guess the plural before checking the rule
• Predict the meaning of a word from context
• Conjugate before you see the table

Struggling before input leads to deeper encoding and better recall later.

9. Rebuild Rather Than Reread

Instead of rereading your notes, try to rebuild them from scratch.

This technique, sometimes called free recall, is a powerful way to strengthen memory (Karpicke & Blunt, 2011).

• After a lesson, write what you remember on a blank page
• After a reading, summarize the key points in your target language
• After a grammar explanation, reconstruct the rule in your own words

This "blank page method" makes forgetting visible, so you know exactly what to target in your next review.

10. Ask Yourself Better Questions

Most learners ask, "Do I know this?"

But a better question is:

"Could I explain this to someone else right now, without notes?"

This taps into metacognition (awareness of your knowledge) and improves both monitoring and control of learning (Dunlosky & Metcalfe, 2009).

Ask:

• Can I use this word in three different contexts?
• Could I teach this rule to a beginner?
• Can I apply this pattern in a new sentence?

Good questions drive retrieval, and retrieval drives fluency.

Quick Recap

In this article, you've learned why forgetting is not a flaw, but a key mechanism of deep language learning.

• Fluency is built on retrieval, not recognition. Struggling to recall strengthens long-term memory (Bjork & Bjork, 1992; Karpicke & Roediger, 2008).
• Storage ≠ retrieval. You may feel you know a word (high storage), but still fail to access it without a recent recall (Bjork & Bjork, 1992).
• Forgetting happens due to interference, not decay. Competing memories block access (McGeoch, 1932), especially in multilingual learners.
• Learning is cumulative and context-sensitive. Knowledge stabilizes across repeated retrievals, not in one exposure (Estes, 1950; Carey, 2014).
• The forgetting curve is a guide, not a threat. Retrieval spaced at the edge of forgetting boosts retention (Ebbinghaus, 1913; Cepeda et al., 2006).
• Effortful recall is a learning event. Even failed attempts enhance memory consolidation (Kriechbaum & Bäuml, 2023).
• The brain filters for relevance and emotion. We remember what feels meaningful or goal-related (Carey, 2014; Tyng et al., 2017).
• Retrieval-based strategies work best. Use generation, elaboration, interleaving, and varied contexts instead of passive review (Slamecka & Graf, 1978; Kornell et al., 2009).

Thanks for reading!

If you found this helpful, leave a comment, follow, and subscribe.

Join thousands of motivated learners and get my free 7-Day Language Boost Challenge.

And if you'd like to support my work, you can buy me a coffee ☕️ — a kind gesture that fuels the long hours I spend researching, writing, and simplifying science with love… often with a small baby on my lap 💛

Recommended Reading

To explore the research and strategies mentioned here in more depth, read my previous articles:

1. How to Learn 5,000 Words (and More) Without Flashcards

A research-backed system for vocabulary retention that works with your brain, not against it.

2. Inside the Multilingual Mind

Discover how multilingual brains manage interference, store knowledge, and thrive on complexity.

3. How to Learn a Language: The Complete System That Actually Works

My full framework for building language fluency step by step, with cognitive science as the foundation.

References

• Bjork, R. A. (1994). Memory and metamemory considerations in the training of human beings. Metacognition: Knowing about Knowing, 185–205.
• Bjork, R. A., & Bjork, E. L. (1992). A new theory of disuse and an old theory of stimulus fluctuation. In A. Healy, S. Kosslyn, & R. Shiffrin (Eds.), From learning processes to cognitive processes: Essays in honor of William K. Estes (Vol. 2, pp. 35–67). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Carey, B. (2014). How we learn: The surprising truth about when, where, and why it happens. Random House.
• Cepeda, N. J., Pashler, H., Vul, E., Wixted, J. T., & Rohrer, D. (2006). Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 132(3), 354–380. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.3.354
• Dunlosky, J., & Metcalfe, J. (2009). Metacognition. SAGE Publications.
• Ebbinghaus, H. (1913). Memory: A contribution to experimental psychology (H. A. Ruger & C. E. Bussenius, Trans.). Teachers College, Columbia University. (Original work published 1885)
• Estes, W. K. (1950). Toward a statistical theory of learning. Psychological Review, 57(2), 94–107. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0058559
• Karpicke, J. D., & Blunt, J. R. (2011). Retrieval practice produces more learning than elaborative studying with concept mapping. Science, 331(6018), 772–775. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1199327
• Karpicke, J. D., & Roediger, H. L. (2008). The critical importance of retrieval for learning. Science, 319(5865), 966–968. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1152408
• Kornell, N., & Bjork, R. A. (2009). A stability bias in human memory: Overestimating the remembered. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138(4), 449–468.
• Kriechbaum, D., & Bäuml, K. H. T. (2023). Time-dependent benefits of retrieval practice in foreign-language learning. Scientific Reports, 13, 5481. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-32916-7
• McGeoch, J. A. (1932). Forgetting and the law of disuse. Psychological Review, 39(4), 352–370. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0069819
• Roediger, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D. (2006). Test-enhanced learning: Taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychological Science, 17(3), 249–255.
• Rohrer, D., & Taylor, K. (2007). The shuffling of mathematics problems improves learning. Instructional Science, 35(6), 481–498.
• Slamecka, N. J., & Graf, P. (1978). The generation effect: Delineation of a phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4(6), 592–604.
• Thorndike, E. L. (1914). The psychology of learning. Teachers College, Columbia University.
• Tyng, C. M., Amin, H. U., Saad, M. N. M., & Malik, A. S. (2017). The influences of emotion on learning and memory. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1454. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01454